Wednesday, September 26, 2007
What Is This Kyoto Treaty Thing?
Before Bush there was Clinton. The treaty had come up for a vote in the US Senate. It was unanimously voted down. This always struck me as a significant fact. Every Democrat had voted NO on the treaty. AND no other nation had ratified it.
After the Bush European trip, where all those politicians had bashed Bush and America for the attention of all those voters back home, European ratification became an issue. So, they had a big meeting in Vienna (rather than just going ahead and ratifying it). There they added a little clause at the end of the treaty. "None of this is legaly binding." Then they ratified it.
This has always struck me as a significant addition. Since then the announcement by one nation or another that they will fail to meet their Kyoto targets has been a routine part of the news.
So, what's the big deal with this Kyoto Treaty thing?
Saturday, September 22, 2007
Don't Sue God
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/ ... 3986.shtml
This guy in Nebraska - Nebraska! - Aren't they level-headed in Nebraska? This story belongs in California. Anyway this guy in Nebraska sues God. Wants a court order to make Him stop world suffering or something like that. Says he just wants to make a point. But then God answers back. The court official says that His papers just "miraculously appeared" on the desk. - In keeping with the spirit of the story, no doubt. So now, the plaintiff has an actual lawsuit on his hands!
Jay Leno opined that this lawsuit is very unfair to God. God is in heaven. Where in heaven is He going to find a lawyer?
Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Religeon vs. Science?
As for religeon, I think that we ought to take the Bible literally unless there is significant scientific evidence to the contrary. It seems pretty clear to me that the Bible was not intended to have the scientific exactitude for dating that us moderns are used to. Mankind's very concept of time has evolved since ancient days.
To be fair here, today's aggressors do seem to come from not from science itself but from left-wingers who use science to advance an anti-Christian agenda. Creationism controversies in the news have wanted to include "intelligent design" as well as evolution in the schools. The other side has wanted only their own views taught. Even despite their lack of tolerance for the other side's point of view, the evolutionists would still have my sympathy if only they weren't so militant about it.
Here is an interesting article about the latest developments in this area from science's point of view.
Monday, September 3, 2007
Wonders of the World
7 new Wonders to match the 7 original wonders. A private group conducted a global poll. People voted, American Idol style. It seems a little interesting as it reflects opinions on such things. As much as I worship Jesus Christ, the statue in Rio hardly ranks as humanities greatest accomplishments. Other entrants were similar. So many for Latin America, so many for the Middle Ease, and so on.
Here is the newest list. This is from the National Geographic.
- Christ the Redeemer" statue in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Great Wall of China
- The Colosseum, Rome, Italy
- Petra, Jordan
- Machu Picchu, Peru
- Chichén Itzá, Mexico
- Taj Mahal, India
- The Great Pyramid of Giza, Egypt
- The Colossus of Rhodes, Greece
- The Lighthouse of Alexandra, Egypt
- The Statue of Zeus at Olympia, Greece
- The Hanging Gardens of Babylon, Iraq
- The Mausoleum of Halicarnassus, Turkey
- The Temple of Artemis, Turkey
Just wonder why the Voyager* didn’t make it. Imagine standing in New York and hitting a golf ball to a hole in Los Angeles and scoring a hole-in-one. That was Voyager. One can think of a number of fantastic things mankind has accomplished in recent centuries.
As for the original wonders of the ancients, for the technology of their day, they really were Wonders of the World. The Colossus of Rhodes is an excellent example.
-------------------
* Voyager is the name of the spacecraft that flew by the outer planets and eventually left the solar system entirely.