Here's the story in today's Washington Post. First, they had endorsed the "no-fly zone" military intervention in Libya; now that it has actually started, they want to reverse themselves. What are we to make of this?
1) Acording to the story, the Arab leadership had not properly negotiated the meaning and the scope of "the no-fly zone". How could such an endorsement have been issued without the proper understandings having been reached?
The suspicion cannot be helped. They were just playing politics. Blame the West for the rebels loosing but now that their bluff has been called, the new line is to blame the West for intervening.
2) Why could the members of the Libyan League not have intervened themselves? Just how weak is the Arab World both politically and militarily?
The bottom line summary of this potential reversal is to underline the political and military weakness of the Arab nations.
Below is a summary of the day's operations.
The End
-
I’m suspending further publication of this blog due to lack of time. This
notice formalizes what has been evident for some time. I intend to
concentrate on...
12 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment